Peer Reviews + academic studies
Clinical EvidenceEvidence-Based Excellence: Transparency and Patient Care at Our Core
At Vetology, our products are rooted in peer-reviewed research and clinical studies conducted by leading academic institutions. This commitment to transparency ensures veterinarians can trust that our AI tools are both effective and safe, prioritizing patient outcomes and supporting clinical decision-making.
We invite academics and researchers interested in advancing veterinary medicine to collaborate with us. If you’re conducting studies or wish to explore Vetology’s technology, we’d love to hear from you. Let’s build the future of veterinary care together.
Explore Peer Reviews and Studies
Vetology AI is clinically proven. We are so confident of our product, that we actively invite third-party peer reviews of our platform.
Clinical Review: Accuracy of AI Software for the Detection of Confirmed Pleural Effusion in Dogs
A study by researchers at Tufts University, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine tested Vetology AI’s accuracy in detecting pleural effusion in canine thoracic X-rays.
Clinical Review: AI vs. Veterinary Radiologist on Canine Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the AI-based software compared to radiologist diagnosis were 92.3%, 91.3%, and 92.4%, respectively. Click to read more on whether the findings supported using AI software screening for thoracic radiographs of dogs with suspected cardiogenic pulmonary edema.